Showing posts with label Palestine. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Palestine. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Israel v. Palestinian Authority (International Court of Justice)

Israel is Not in Violation of Article 49 of the Geneva Convention
By Kirsten Dunn
Kirsten Dunn is a third-year student at Albany Law School, scheduled to graduate in May 2016. She is also a candidate to receive an M.S. in bioethics from Albany Medical College.
Kirsten is the co-Executive for the student chapter of the National Association of Elder Law Attorneys (NAELA), as well as a member of the Elder Law and Health Law Societies.
Kirsten was recently profiled on the Albany Law School website: Family Matters: Dunn '16, Mother of 9, Closing in on J.D. (http://www.albanylaw.edu/students/spotlight/Pages/Kirsten-Dunn-16-Mother-of-9-Closing-in-on-J-D.aspx)
She wrote this paper on Israel v. Palestinian Authority, for Professor Bonventre’s International Law of War and Crime seminar, Fall 2015. 


LETTER FROM THE AGENT OF ISRAEL TO THE REGISTRAR
OF THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE . 

I have the honour to submit for consideration of the Court the Application instituting proceedings for Summary Judgment with regard to Israel’s alleged violations of Article 49 of the Geneva Convention (Israel v. Palestinian Authority).  Understanding that the Palestinian Authority is not a recognized member state within the United Nations, Israel hereby seeks recognition of Israel’s sovereignty over the areas of Judea and Samaria through this summary judgment motion.  In the event that this Court cannot make such a judgment over the non-member state of the Palestinian Authority, Israel hereby requests an Official Advisory Opinion be issued in lieu of such Summary Judgment.

(Signed) Kirsten Dunn,
Agent for the Nation of Israel
____________________________
To read the entire paper, open HERE.

Sunday, September 2, 2012

U.N. Recognition of Palestinian Statehood and Children


The Potential Impact on Their Welfare

By Nadia I. Arginteanu
Nadia Arginteanu, a third year student at Albany Law School, is Editor-in-Chief of the Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology. She is a graduate of Bard College where she majored in political science. She will graduate from Albany Law School in May 2013 with a concentration in International Law.
This paper was prepared for Professor Harrington's course, International Child Rights, Spring 2012.
  
Undoubtedly, one of the most difficult issues that the international community has had to deal with is the question of Palestine. The Arab-Israel conflict over Palestine is nearly intractable and has been a major point of debate and contention for decades.

The military and political conflict that has taken hold of the region has caused a great deal of suffering for the children living in the Occupied Palestinian Territories (“OPT”) comprised of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Children in these regions are not only hurt by the violence of warfare, but due to the political turmoil of the region are often denied the fundamental rights that the international community has recognized all children should be afforded, such as education and healthcare.

Though the political status of Palestine has been at a standstill for many years, recently, steps have been made by the current political leadership of Palestine, the Palestinian Authority, to change Palestine’s status both in the United Nations and in the international community as a whole. For example, in October 2011 the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (“UNESCO”) recognized Palestine as a full member state. Recognition of Palestine by UNESCO was controversial, but not as controversial as the recent bid on September 23, 2011 by the Palestinian Authority to gain full membership in the United Nations during the 2011 session of the United Nations General Assembly.

This paper will argue that if the United Nations were to recognize Palestinian statehood and admit it as a full member state, or at the very least elevate Palestine to the status of a non-member state observer, either of these changes would have a positive impact on the lives of Palestinian children. Changing the political status of Palestine would change the status of Palestinian children, affording these children increased rights and protections under international law.*
_____________________________
* Citations to references in this introduction are available in the paper.
To read the entire paper, open HERE.